- FMA
- The Fabricator
- FABTECH
- Canadian Metalworking
Categories
- Additive Manufacturing
- Aluminum Welding
- Arc Welding
- Assembly and Joining
- Automation and Robotics
- Bending and Forming
- Consumables
- Cutting and Weld Prep
- Electric Vehicles
- En Español
- Finishing
- Hydroforming
- Laser Cutting
- Laser Welding
- Machining
- Manufacturing Software
- Materials Handling
- Metals/Materials
- Oxyfuel Cutting
- Plasma Cutting
- Power Tools
- Punching and Other Holemaking
- Roll Forming
- Safety
- Sawing
- Shearing
- Shop Management
- Testing and Measuring
- Tube and Pipe Fabrication
- Tube and Pipe Production
- Waterjet Cutting
Industry Directory
Webcasts
Podcasts
FAB 40
Advertise
Subscribe
Account Login
Search
Arc Welding 101: Defining a fillet weld with D1.1
- By Paul Cameron
- May 13, 2016
- Article
- Arc Welding
Q: I'm auditing a fab shop and have a question regarding the AWS D1.1 code. The shop is referring to the corner joints in the plates encompassing the columns as fillet welds, yet there is no faying surface. D1.1 says a fillet can have up to 3/16-in. misalignment (with certain stipulations), which effectively makes the joint an open root complete joint penetration (CJP).
The shop is having substantial issues with cracking through the throat, which isn’t surprising. My issue, though, is with the joint design. I’m inclined to say it is not a fillet weld, but I cannot find a code reference to support that claim. I also cannot find a prequalified weld procedure specification (WPS) and joint configuration that in any way resembles this partial-joint-penetration (PJP) or CJP groove.
Am I missing something in the code that resolves this? What course of action would you advise?
A: I'm not sure of the plate thickness, but based on the photo you provided, it looks to be about 3/8 in. If that's the case, these ¼-in. fillet welds are undersized. I can tell because the leg does not extend halfway up the plate thickness and its contour is concave.
With that said, this is a common fillet weld on an outside corner joint. Fig 5.4(F) shows a picture of it.
Here are a couple of questions I would ask:
- Does the shop have a WPS for welding this? The fillet looks to have been done vertically down. This would require procedure qualification record (PQR) testing.
- What process is used? It looks to be GMAW-S (short-circuit transfer). If so, this would require PQR testing as well.
I'm sure their cracking is due to insufficient throat. You can fix that by ensuring the weld meets the size requirement. If the weld is engineered correctly and qualified/prequalified to ensure mechanical, chemical, and soundness requirements, the cracking will be a thing of the past.
That should do it.
About the Author
Paul Cameron
Braun Intertec
4210 Highway 14 East
Rochester, MN 55904
About the Publication
subscribe now
The Welder, formerly known as Practical Welding Today, is a showcase of the real people who make the products we use and work with every day. This magazine has served the welding community in North America well for more than 20 years.
start your free subscription- Stay connected from anywhere
Easily access valuable industry resources now with full access to the digital edition of The Fabricator.
Easily access valuable industry resources now with full access to the digital edition of The Welder.
Easily access valuable industry resources now with full access to the digital edition of The Tube and Pipe Journal.
Easily access valuable industry resources now with full access to the digital edition of The Fabricator en Español.
- Podcasting
- Podcast:
- The Fabricator Podcast
- Published:
- 04/16/2024
- Running Time:
- 63:29
In this episode of The Fabricator Podcast, Caleb Chamberlain, co-founder and CEO of OSH Cut, discusses his company’s...
- Industry Events
16th Annual Safety Conference
- April 30 - May 1, 2024
- Elgin,
Pipe and Tube Conference
- May 21 - 22, 2024
- Omaha, NE
World-Class Roll Forming Workshop
- June 5 - 6, 2024
- Louisville, KY
Advanced Laser Application Workshop
- June 25 - 27, 2024
- Novi, MI