The most important output of 3-D CAD modeling

Techniques to consider when modeling components in for a design project

THE FABRICATOR® JUNE 2009

June 1, 2009

By:

The most important output from a CAD system is the bill of material. Columnist Gerald Davis gives us an idea of just how much detail should go into creating a BOM.

Bill Precision Figure 1

Figure 1Click to view image larger This drawing with a BOM helps both purchasing and manufacturing.

I recently attended a very interesting presentation by Chris Naujok, an engineer who is a SolidWorks® guru. One of the first questions he asked his audience of CAD jockeys was this: What is the most important thing you produce?

The shouted responses included "drawings," "great designs," "great products," and "cost reductions." He agreed that all of those are important, but the most important output from our CAD systems is a bill of materials (BOM).

The BOM may seem mundane, but it is what makes purchasing, accounting, and manufacturing happen. Without it, there isn't much point to CAD modeling. An example of a drawing with a BOM is shown in Figure 1.

BOMs Away

So why not just fire up a spreadsheet and prepare a BOM like the one shown in Figure 2? Why mess with the 3-D CAD system at all? If the spreadsheet will convey what the product looks like, how the parts fit together, and how the parts will be obtained, then the answer is "no CAD required."

With the BOM as the goal, then, we know a lot about how to model our project. We need to complete the project quickly, which is a given; modeling efficiently is something we always strive for. We also know that the parts have to fit together; if the holes don't align, we will be maligned. Other automatic goals are to have it look great and to make the design suitable for manufacturing.

Minimalist Mentality

The two kinds of objects in the world are things that are purchased and things that are made. Over the years I have observed that many folks who were just starting out in the 3-D CAD business spent an inordinate amount of time putting perfect detail into every component.

Figure 3 is an example of a fan that is purchased. The model includes a properly shaped propeller that even rotates!

For those components in our product that are purchased, we probably don't need to model anything beyond the features that influence the parts that we will have custom-made. Figure 4 shows the frame of the fan. We can use it to locate the mounting holes and airflow cutout. We don't really need the propeller if all we're doing is modeling the sheet metal chassis.

Of course, if we are manufacturing nuts and bolts, then modeling the threads and grade marks would be very important. If we're just including the fasteners in our model in order to generate a complete BOM, then just a representative shape will probably do the job.

Sometimes occasions arise when realism is vital. I've made presentations of a design concept that featured the minimalist approach as well as presentations based on models that were ridiculously detailed. In nearly every case, my design was more favorably received when the presentation appeared more realistic. The exceptions were those individuals who knew how much the extraneous detail added to the time and cost of my presentation.

Figure 5 shows a model that has quite a bit of detail in the electronics. The goal was to design the sheet metal enclosure, so all of the work that I put into modeling the legs on the IC chips seemed frivolous. However, during the presentation, one of the electrical engineers used that detail to make an important point about the project. It is hard to predict how much is too much.

Lazy or Clever?

A lazy CAD jockey will model the parts so that the production of the mechanical drawing for manufacturing is nearly automatic. This is accomplished by dimensioning the modeling sketches so that they can be imported directly into the drafting work. If you can anticipate that far in advance, then modeling your part that way can save some serious effort.

Next month we'll take a closer look at generating drawings for manufacturing. It isn't fully automatic, but there are techniques that can bring joy into the drafting of prints.

Gerald would love to have you send him your comments and questions. You are not alone, and the problems you face often are shared by others. Share the grief, and perhaps we will all share in the joy of finding answers. Please send your questions and comments to dand@thefabricator.com.



Gerald Davis Design and Consulting

Gerald Davis

Contributing Writer
Gerald Davis Design and Consulting

More in Shop Management from TheFabricator.com

Published In...

The Fabricator®

The FABRICATOR® is North America's leading magazine for the metal forming and fabricating industry. The magazine delivers the news, technical articles, and case histories that enable fabricators to do their jobs more efficiently. The FABRICATOR has served the industry since 1971. Print subscriptions are free to qualified persons in North America involved in metal forming and fabricating.

Preview the Digital Edition

Subscribe to The Fabricator®

Read more from this issue

comments powered by Disqus