June 5, 2014
Q: I manage a toolroom of 15 toolmakers. We supply the automotive connector industry primarily. I am looking for best practices on progressive-die maintenance. Do you recommend any die maintenance procedures?
A: I am literally inundated with questions on the proper way to maintain progressive dies. Here is the standard response:
This is what many tooling managers would expect to hear, and in fact these items are required. But is this what we are looking for when we talk about maintenance best practices?
When maintaining any process, it is best to first understand the end goal, then fill in the tasks (similar to the ones I just listed). When maintaining a progressive die, the three primary end goals are:
Documentation - What is the procedure for servicing the areas of degradation? For example, how much do you grind off the punch and die when sharpening? What polishing tool and media do you use to polish the forming inserts? Which tooling dimensions need to be checked, and to what tolerances? With this huge area of variation, you need a guide to ensure each service tech does things the same way to get the same results (see Tooling Laws 2 and 8). You cannot adjust or improve on an inconsistent process.
Continuous improvement does not start until you have captured all the wear items and have a documented, consistent way to maintain them. The results must be measurable and consistent. You should be able to take part measurements off the stamping die with minimal accepted variation defined and controlled using statistical process control (SPC). In addition, your hits per service should be consistent from run to run, and component replacement should have no effect on the part quality.
Continuous improvement - Once you’ve achieved consistent, measurable results, you can begin the final leg of the best-in-practice maintenance policy. What can be improved upon? What can you do to improve the robustness of the tool? How can you address areas of the tool that are yielding the greatest variation and improve tooling life? What can you do to increase stamping speed and throughput? Perhaps a new steel or carbide would improve hits per service. A new coating might reduce wear.
Continuous improvement is an absolute requirement in which SMART (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, time-bound) goals should be documented and tracked. Remember, if you are not improving, you are, in effect, losing ground as a result of your competition moving forward (see Tooling Law 10).
A best-in-class maintenance procedure will result in a very predictable process. You can predict what needs to be done and when you need to do it. Your quality data will be consistent, and you’ll minimize unplanned downtime as you predict and plan for service intervals. You will be able to better meet production schedules and achieve perfect execution (see Tooling Law 5).
Good luck and happy stamping!Tom Vacca’s 10 Tooling Laws
STAMPING Journal® is the only industrial publication dedicated solely to serving the needs of the metal stamping market. In 1987 the American Metal Stamping Association broadened its horizons and renamed itself and its publication, known then as Metal Stamping. Print subscriptions are free to qualified stamping professionals in North America.