Contributing Writer
- FMA
- The Fabricator
- FABTECH
- Canadian Metalworking
Categories
- Additive Manufacturing
- Aluminum Welding
- Arc Welding
- Assembly and Joining
- Automation and Robotics
- Bending and Forming
- Consumables
- Cutting and Weld Prep
- Electric Vehicles
- En Español
- Finishing
- Hydroforming
- Laser Cutting
- Laser Welding
- Machining
- Manufacturing Software
- Materials Handling
- Metals/Materials
- Oxyfuel Cutting
- Plasma Cutting
- Power Tools
- Punching and Other Holemaking
- Roll Forming
- Safety
- Sawing
- Shearing
- Shop Management
- Testing and Measuring
- Tube and Pipe Fabrication
- Tube and Pipe Production
- Waterjet Cutting
Industry Directory
Webcasts
Podcasts
FAB 40
Advertise
Subscribe
Account Login
Search
Die Science: Attempting to defy the laws of physics, Part II
Unrealistic part features
- By Art Hedrick
- May 10, 2011
- Article
- Bending and Forming
Editor's Note: This is Part II of a two-part article on part tolerancing. Part I, which appeared in the March/April 2011 issue, discussed the effects of variations in the incoming metal and the importance of consistent strain levels.
It is almost unrealistic to expect some part features to remain within a small tolerancing zone.
Hole Position
Hole position tolerance is a big one. In fact, I am very confident that as I am writing this article, within a 500-mile radius at least 500 QC inspectors are complaining about the dies being unable to hold a certain positional tolerance on the pierced holes.
To understand why it is sometimes very difficult to achieve and maintain certain positional tolerances, you need to understand the entire process and all of its variables. One of the least-understood concepts is the catalyst for this question: If all of the holes that have a small tolerance are pierced in the part in a single operation, why don't they maintain the same positional relationship with each other?
For those who don't understand the variables, it would seem logical that two holes exactly 200 mm apart in the die would measure 200 mm apart in the part. However, this is not true, especially if the parts have shape to them.
Remember, the incoming material is not perfectly consistent. This inconsistency in material, as well as other factors, results in different springback values for each part.
In a nutshell, each part made has a slightly different shape. While this difference might be well within the form or profile of the part's surface tolerance, keep in mind that as a rule, positional tolerances of features such as pierced holes typically are held to much tighter tolerances.
For the holes to be pierced in the part, the part must nest or fit onto a punch that matches the profile or the shape of the part. This punch usually is cut to the exact profile or shape of the designed part. Even though the punch is cut very accurately, it's unlikely the part will fit perfectly onto the punch—and every part will fit differently on the punch.
A spring- or nitrogen-loaded pressure pad, cut to fit the designed shape of the part, is used to hold the part tightly to the punch. When this pad contacts the part, it forces the part to take the ideal shape by pushing, twisting, and bending part surfaces back to their intended geometry (see Figure 1).
When the pad is fully engaged, the pierce holes get put in the part in the desired location. However, once the pad is removed, the part will return to the original shape that came out of the forming die, and position of the pierced holes will move with the surfaces of the part.
So why not fit the punch and the pad to the part that is coming out of the forming die? While this is sometimes attempted, the inconsistency of the formed part makes it hard to determine just what the shape should be.
Basically, when you specify a tight positional tolerance on two holes distanced far apart on a formed part, you are asking for the same tolerance on the shape of the part. Good luck with that one!
Flatness
Of all the geometric tolerances that are difficult to achieve, flatness is one of the hardest. Many people believe that dies are responsible for part flatness. While dies sometimes can improve or diminish the flatness of a part, their main purpose is to retain a given flatness in the incoming material.
Part flatness is more a product of the coil straightener and tension leveler, and it is affected by the severity of the steel cutting deformation, the sheet material's mechanical properties, incoming material or coil flatness, metal thickness, and residual stress created in prior operations.
For example, specifying a flatness tolerance of 0.002 in. total indicator reading (TIR) over the surface of a 0.010-in.-thick stainless steel part that is 2 by 4 in. is insanity. Keep in mind that the coil this part is made from is wound over a mandrel and contains coil set. The amount of coil set changes with respect to how tightly the coil is wound. To remove the coil set, the material must be strained using a tension leveler and straightener.
To achieve a critical flatness characteristic, most die designers try to keep the part flat during cutting and also employ methods such as pressure blanking, compound blanking, cut-and-carry, fineblanking, and GRIP®flow.
Achieving certain tolerances can be very difficult. Only through a comprehensive understanding of the stamping process can you dimension and tolerance your parts accurately.
Until next time...Best of luck!
About the Author
Art Hedrick
10855 Simpson Drive West Private
Greenville, MI 48838
616-894-6855
Related Companies
subscribe now
The Fabricator is North America's leading magazine for the metal forming and fabricating industry. The magazine delivers the news, technical articles, and case histories that enable fabricators to do their jobs more efficiently. The Fabricator has served the industry since 1970.
start your free subscription- Stay connected from anywhere
Easily access valuable industry resources now with full access to the digital edition of The Fabricator.
Easily access valuable industry resources now with full access to the digital edition of The Welder.
Easily access valuable industry resources now with full access to the digital edition of The Tube and Pipe Journal.
Easily access valuable industry resources now with full access to the digital edition of The Fabricator en Español.
- Podcasting
- Podcast:
- The Fabricator Podcast
- Published:
- 04/16/2024
- Running Time:
- 63:29
In this episode of The Fabricator Podcast, Caleb Chamberlain, co-founder and CEO of OSH Cut, discusses his company’s...
- Industry Events
16th Annual Safety Conference
- April 30 - May 1, 2024
- Elgin,
Pipe and Tube Conference
- May 21 - 22, 2024
- Omaha, NE
World-Class Roll Forming Workshop
- June 5 - 6, 2024
- Louisville, KY
Advanced Laser Application Workshop
- June 25 - 27, 2024
- Novi, MI