Global Product Manager, Subarc Filler Metals
- FMA
- The Fabricator
- FABTECH
- Canadian Metalworking
Categories
- Additive Manufacturing
- Aluminum Welding
- Arc Welding
- Assembly and Joining
- Automation and Robotics
- Bending and Forming
- Consumables
- Cutting and Weld Prep
- Electric Vehicles
- En Español
- Finishing
- Hydroforming
- Laser Cutting
- Laser Welding
- Machining
- Manufacturing Software
- Materials Handling
- Metals/Materials
- Oxyfuel Cutting
- Plasma Cutting
- Power Tools
- Punching and Other Holemaking
- Roll Forming
- Safety
- Sawing
- Shearing
- Shop Management
- Testing and Measuring
- Tube and Pipe Fabrication
- Tube and Pipe Production
- Waterjet Cutting
Industry Directory
Webcasts
Podcasts
FAB 40
Advertise
Subscribe
Account Login
Search
Electroslag cladding provides alternative to standard cladding techniques
Deposition rate, travel speed boost productivity
- By Peter Jeirud and Pieter Keultjes
- August 25, 2015
- Article
- Tube and Pipe Fabrication
What do you do when you need to repair a worn surface on an item such as a nozzle, ball valve, roll tool, or a shaft? Or, let’s say you’re designing a component that needs excellent wear resistance, but the best material for the application is prohibitively expensive? In such cases, cladding might be the way to go.
Cladding, the process of adding a layer to an existing workpiece in either the manufacturing or repair stage, often is used to deposit a specially alloyed material onto the component’s surface. It is usually more cost-effective to apply the specialty layer only where needed rather than fabricate the entire structure from the more expensive alloy.
Cladding can be done in a number of ways, but one of the most flexible is weld cladding. All welding processes can be used for cladding, but constraints in the physical requirements make some welding processes better suited to the process than others. For example, gas tungsten arc welding (GTAW) is not well-suited to cladding large items or areas that need a large amount of buildup. GTAW’s typical deposition rate, about 5 pounds per hour, is too low for big jobs. On the other hand, GTAW can be an excellent candidate when cladding in restricted areas, such as on the ID of a small-diameter valve.
Strip cladding processes are well-suited for applications that require high deposition rates. They have been used for decades. One of the most commonly used processes, submerged arc strip cladding (SASC), also is one of the most productive, offering deposition rates of about 33 lbs. per hour.
However, technologies change, and advancements in consumables have made electroslag strip cladding (ESSC) a good alternative to SASC in some applications, such as oil and gas, pressure vessel, and petrochemical. ESSC can save time and material costs and increase the deposition rate. SASC and ESSC are the formal designations, but the processes commonly are called SAW and ESW.
How Strip Cladding Works
ESSC and SASC are similar processes, but they differ in that SASC uses an arc while ESSC is a resistance heating process. The arc in SASC runs along the entire strip width. Because the weld pool penetrates the base material, dilution levels typically are about 20 percent.
ESSC uses a delivery system to feed the strip, much like wire is fed through a gun in a typical wire welding process. Because ESSC is not an arc process, heating takes place in the flux, which is conductive. The heat melts the strip and base material into the liquid slag, which then is transferred into molten metal that is deposited onto the base material. The strip actually rides on top of the slag system created by the flux, protecting the weld (see Figure 1).
ESSC’s dilution rate is low, typically about 10 percent, and it provides favorable deposition rates, travel speeds, and flux consumption. The heat input of the two processes is comparable.
Deposition Rates
Because the dilution rate with ESSC is low, the process often can be completed by applying just one layer of material at a standard travel speed, whereas two layers typically are required when using a high-speed ESSC flux. This reduces the consumable cost by half. The typical travel speed offered by the ESSC process is double that of SASC, 10 inches per minute compared with 5 IPM. ESSC has a high deposition rate, in some cases reaching 55 lbs. per hour.
Another time-saving benefit of the ESSC process stems from the electroslag refining that occurs when the molten metal passes through the slag bath. This results in cleaner weld metal with lower oxygen levels, which means less postweld cleaning is necessary for some applications.
Best Practices for Optimized Results
To achieve the desired weld metal composition, it’s important to choose the right combination of strip electrode and flux and to use the optimal welding parameters.
- It’s necessary to use a dedicated ESSC flux that provides good electrical conductivity at high temperatures. To this end, these fluxes typically have higher fluoride content than other fluxes.
- The flux determines the optimal voltage range, which tends to be narrower than the SASC voltage range. A voltage that is too high causes spatter and unstable fusion, and voltage that is too low increases the risk of short-circuiting as a result of the strip sticking to the base metal.
- The size and shape of the components to be surfaced determine the consumable selection. Strip electrodes are typically 0.5 mm thick, and standard widths include 30, 60, and 90 mm.
- When using ESSC, it’s important to use magnetic steering when the strip width is greater than 60 mm. The magnetic field created by the high current causes the molten metal to move from the edge to the inside of the cladded plate. Using magnetic steering connected to the welding head can help control this effect.
Return on Investment
ESSC may require investing in more equipment than SASC, a factor that could make some companies hesitant to consider the process. Cladding is typically a continuous operation that requires high amperages and high duty cycles.
However, the productivity and efficiency gains that result from the increased travel speeds and deposition rates, lower dilution rates, and reduced use of welding consumables mean the return on investment can be a few months.
About the Authors
Peter Jeirud
1635 W. Spencer St.
Appleton, WI 54912
920-734-9821
Pieter Keultjes
Global Product Manager, Subarc Equipment
1635 W. Spencer St.
Appleton, WI 54912
920-734-9821
About the Publication
Related Companies
subscribe now
The Tube and Pipe Journal became the first magazine dedicated to serving the metal tube and pipe industry in 1990. Today, it remains the only North American publication devoted to this industry, and it has become the most trusted source of information for tube and pipe professionals.
start your free subscription- Stay connected from anywhere
Easily access valuable industry resources now with full access to the digital edition of The Fabricator.
Easily access valuable industry resources now with full access to the digital edition of The Welder.
Easily access valuable industry resources now with full access to the digital edition of The Tube and Pipe Journal.
Easily access valuable industry resources now with full access to the digital edition of The Fabricator en Español.
- Podcasting
- Podcast:
- The Fabricator Podcast
- Published:
- 04/16/2024
- Running Time:
- 63:29
In this episode of The Fabricator Podcast, Caleb Chamberlain, co-founder and CEO of OSH Cut, discusses his company’s...
- Industry Events
16th Annual Safety Conference
- April 30 - May 1, 2024
- Elgin,
Pipe and Tube Conference
- May 21 - 22, 2024
- Omaha, NE
World-Class Roll Forming Workshop
- June 5 - 6, 2024
- Louisville, KY
Advanced Laser Application Workshop
- June 25 - 27, 2024
- Novi, MI