Editor-in-Chief
- FMA
- The Fabricator
- FABTECH
- Canadian Metalworking
Categories
- Additive Manufacturing
- Aluminum Welding
- Arc Welding
- Assembly and Joining
- Automation and Robotics
- Bending and Forming
- Consumables
- Cutting and Weld Prep
- Electric Vehicles
- En Español
- Finishing
- Hydroforming
- Laser Cutting
- Laser Welding
- Machining
- Manufacturing Software
- Materials Handling
- Metals/Materials
- Oxyfuel Cutting
- Plasma Cutting
- Power Tools
- Punching and Other Holemaking
- Roll Forming
- Safety
- Sawing
- Shearing
- Shop Management
- Testing and Measuring
- Tube and Pipe Fabrication
- Tube and Pipe Production
- Waterjet Cutting
Industry Directory
Webcasts
Podcasts
FAB 40
Advertise
Subscribe
Account Login
Search
Making It in America
- By Dan Davis
- May 28, 2010
So when summer rolls around I probably feel a bit more patriotic than I might at other times of the year. Rubbing elbows with the chubby guy in star-spangled suspenders and Uncle Sam top hat on July 4 has to make you proud to be an American, right? I wished more people thought so.
I came across this tale of a young man named Yet-Ming Chiang in the Chicago Tribune a couple of weeks ago. Chiang is the inventor of safer and more long-lasting battery technology, but he has experienced trouble trying to manufacture in the U.S. The article provides a quick description of the problem:
"So why are Chiang and his company, A123 Systems, having trouble moving to full-scale commercial production? The answer is a story of both the obstacles to a rebirth of U.S. manufacturing and of the tantalizing possibilities if such a rebirth could be achieved.
"The obstacles are rooted in the sad history of manufacturing's decline in the United States: Despite the promise of Chiang's batteries, many in Wall Street and Silicon Valley were incredulous when he and other leaders at A123 asked for capital to build factories in America: Asia, yes, but Michigan, why would you want to?
"Even more daunting, virtually all of the world's battery-manufacturing industry is in Asia, where plants can be built faster and supplies and equipment are much easier to get than in the United States. These days, it's hard to find Americans who even know how to build a battery factory.
"That's why A123 had to give in and build its first plants in China, where the company could move into production quickly to show auto industry customers that it could deliver on future contracts."
You just have to shake your head. I understand that Detroit could have been considered an expensive place to manufacture, but wasn't there anywhere else in the U.S. that could have been considered an alternative? I mean, Texas is a pretty cost-effective place to live and work, plus they've got good barbecue.
That sort of comment already reinforces the image of the Wall Street and corporate fat cats that see people, or "labor," as they would refer to it, as a bottom-line expense, not as a resource. The reality of these types of people doesn't extend past the doormen who await them at their luxury apartments or the gates that separate them from the unwashed masses.
These controllers of venture capital don't have any allegiance to bettering America. They are committed to maximizing the return on investment for their shareholders.
Check out what happened to A123 with that decision to commit to China first:
"Now, A123 has five plants in China. Bart Riley, an A123 co-founder and chief technology officer, figures it took about nine months to get a Chinese factory up and running, one-third the time typical for the U.S.
"The quicker launch helped A123 make a name for itself through Black & Decker, which in early 2006 began putting A123 batteries in its Dewalt power tools. Since then, A123 has been supplying batteries and battery systems for New York City buses built by Daimler, among other customers, and the company has agreements to develop products for Chrysler, Navistar, and American green-car maker Fisker Automotive.
"But in ramping up production in China, A123 paid an immeasurable price, Riley said: Loss of its intellectual property, the ideas and engineering that made its products better.
"The company did what it could to slow the technology transfer by breaking down the manufacturing process into steps, Riley said, but 'we ended up having to teach these guys how to make our state-of-the-art, world-class batteries. … And some of them are (now) competing with us directly.'"
If America's business leaders can't recognize the huge risks associated with that sort of short-term thinking, it's easy to see how we end up with Wall Street debacles and a gushing oil well at the bottom of the Gulf of Mexico that no one knows how to stop. Everyone is throwing caution to the wind without fully understanding the possible negative results of their decision-making.
I understand that we live in an age when it makes sense to manufacture certain things overseas. I'm not interested in paying $50 for a shovel. However, I'm fearful when I learn that the leaders of the U.S. economy aren't taking steps to foster this country's manufacturing base. I get mad when I think how those people simply dismiss U.S.-based manufacturing without fully exploring potential opportunities.
Chiang and A123 plan to have two factories up and running by the end of next year in the Detroit area. The facilities will employ 400 and possibly up to 2,000 if demand for the company's battery technology takes off.
Interestingly, GM turned down an opportunity to work with A123 in favor of a South Korean company, which was further along in terms of commercializing its battery technology. So a U.S. government-owned entity elected to work with a foreign company instead of a U.S.-based company that has been supported by U.S. government grants?
My head hurts. I'm going to raise my Chinese-made U.S. flag, sit down in my Chinese-made lawn chair, and drink my Mexican beer. Have a good weekend.
subscribe now
The Fabricator is North America's leading magazine for the metal forming and fabricating industry. The magazine delivers the news, technical articles, and case histories that enable fabricators to do their jobs more efficiently. The Fabricator has served the industry since 1970.
start your free subscriptionAbout the Author
Dan Davis
2135 Point Blvd.
Elgin, IL 60123
815-227-8281
Dan Davis is editor-in-chief of The Fabricator, the industry's most widely circulated metal fabricating magazine, and its sister publications, The Tube & Pipe Journal and The Welder. He has been with the publications since April 2002.
- Stay connected from anywhere
Easily access valuable industry resources now with full access to the digital edition of The Fabricator.
Easily access valuable industry resources now with full access to the digital edition of The Welder.
Easily access valuable industry resources now with full access to the digital edition of The Tube and Pipe Journal.
Easily access valuable industry resources now with full access to the digital edition of The Fabricator en Español.
- Podcasting
- Podcast:
- The Fabricator Podcast
- Published:
- 04/16/2024
- Running Time:
- 63:29
In this episode of The Fabricator Podcast, Caleb Chamberlain, co-founder and CEO of OSH Cut, discusses his company’s...
- Trending Articles
AI, machine learning, and the future of metal fabrication
Employee ownership: The best way to ensure engagement
Steel industry reacts to Nucor’s new weekly published HRC price
Dynamic Metal blossoms with each passing year
Metal fabrication management: A guide for new supervisors
- Industry Events
16th Annual Safety Conference
- April 30 - May 1, 2024
- Elgin,
Pipe and Tube Conference
- May 21 - 22, 2024
- Omaha, NE
World-Class Roll Forming Workshop
- June 5 - 6, 2024
- Louisville, KY
Advanced Laser Application Workshop
- June 25 - 27, 2024
- Novi, MI