Software Product Manager
- FMA
- The Fabricator
- FABTECH
- Canadian Metalworking
Our Publications
Categories
- Additive Manufacturing
- Aluminum Welding
- Arc Welding
- Assembly and Joining
- Automation and Robotics
- Bending and Forming
- Consumables
- Cutting and Weld Prep
- Electric Vehicles
- En Español
- Finishing
- Hydroforming
- Laser Cutting
- Laser Welding
- Machining
- Manufacturing Software
- Materials Handling
- Metals/Materials
- Oxyfuel Cutting
- Plasma Cutting
- Power Tools
- Punching and Other Holemaking
- Roll Forming
- Safety
- Sawing
- Shearing
- Shop Management
- Testing and Measuring
- Tube and Pipe Fabrication
- Tube and Pipe Production
- Waterjet Cutting
Industry Directory
Webcasts
Podcasts
FAB 40
Advertise
Subscribe
Account Login
Search
Manual postprocessing snaps the additive manufacturing process chain
Digitizing postprinting processes is key to additive manufacturing’s playing a role in Industry 4.0
- By Christopher Bernard
- November 4, 2021
- Article
- Additive Manufacturing
Digitalization permeates our lives more and more each day, affecting everything from the way we communicate as individuals to how we run our businesses. We are more connected than ever before.
This has been especially true since the early days of the coronavirus pandemic. The critical role that digitalization plays in the future of our society, including manufacturing, has become increasingly obvious.
Additive manufacturing is well-positioned to play a role in digital manufacturing. Once designed in CAD software, parts often can be 3D-printed in hours with minimal manual labor.
The process also eliminates many of the high costs associated with parts production with conventional manufacturing processes. The ability to rapidly make parts at a low cost is why AM was so heavily relied upon for the production of parts during the pandemic.
Thanks to its intelligent, on-demand nature, industrial 3D printing is also well-suited to the oncoming fourth industrial wave, known as Industry 4.0. Going a step beyond automation, Industry 4.0 will enable “smart” production systems via digital assets like the Internet of Things, AI, and Big Data.
Now for the Bad News
That being said, traditional methods of postprocessing, or postprinting, starkly contrast with the cutting-edge design and print steps of AM. Highly laborious processes like surface finishing, sanding, resin removal via vats of isopropyl alcohol, and manual support removal with hand tools are cumbersome and lead to inefficiencies in otherwise streamlined workflows.
Additive manufacturers know this and expect it to have a negative impact on their operations in the future.
“The 2020 Annual Additive Post-Printing Trends Report” found that 46% of additive users think their current postprinting methods will pose future challenges for their AM operations. Regardless of the print technology employed, fully connecting the 3D printing process through the use of digitalization is integral for scaling production-volume printing, traceability, and ensuring that each additive workflow is suited for Industry 4.0.
(Note: the 2021 trends report can be downloaded here.)
Digital Dealmaker
One of the biggest mistakes additive manufacturers make is “siloing” the various steps of the AM process. They treat the additive functions of design, print, and postprinting as individual steps in a linear process instead of an integrated whole. Rather than cutting the digital thread after the print step, data from the first two steps should be leveraged to create a smarter, seamless postprinting experience.
Design for additive manufacturing (DfAM) is one way in which software intelligence can be used to design parts with postprocessing in mind. In addition to leveraging features like soluble support material for certain print technologies, CAD software can be used to design proper contour tooling paths and part orientations that ease the postprinting phase.
Though DfAM can be helpful for designing parts in which postprocessing is a consideration, currently captured data are limited to the design and print steps. By connecting the digital thread through to the postprinting stage, additive users would be able to scale throughput without hiring additional labor, which is critical in light of ongoing labor-shortage issues.
The AM digital thread holds a wealth of knowledge that the industry tends to overlook. For instance, native CAD files and sliced design files could be leveraged to define the necessary requirements and algorithms for postprinting.
In manufacturing, OEE (overall equipment effectiveness) calculations serve to identify the true productivity of a machine or process. Factors impacting this score include availability, performance, and quality. When it comes to additive workflows, each of these factors can be positively affected by digitalization.
Preventive maintenance warnings on printers and postprinting systems help ensure minimum downtime, which optimizes equipment availability. The more frequently the digital thread’s data are monitored, the “smarter” and more adaptable key process parameters become. This, in turn, improves general performance and removes variability.
A custom postprinting approach provides a key benefit of Industry 4.0: its ability to deliver an especially individualized experience for customers and users. Software-intuitive processes shorten the time needed to finish parts, improve part-to-part consistency, lower part breakage and warpage, and raise end-part quality.
The data required to ready postprinting for lights-out, Industry 4.0 manufacturing are at our fingertips, and new technologies make it incrementally easier for additive manufacturers to harness this information. This gets us one step closer to realizing the full promise of 3D printing that the world is ready and waiting for.
SIDEBAR
Case study: automating postprocessing at Protolabs
Contract manufacturing service provider Protolabs inched toward a more digitalized additive manufacturing workflow when it acquired an automated DEMI support-removal system from PostProcess Technologies.
According to Protolabs, Maple Plain, Minn., finishing 90 PolyJet-printed parts typically required about eight hours of manual labor plus four hours of soaking, for a total cycle time of 12 hours. By automating this step, its weekly labor hours dedicated to support removal dropped 50%—from 40 to 20 hours.
Software-enabled features like extensive process monitoring and preventive maintenance also eased the load on operators. As Protolabs continues to scale its operations, end-to-end digital connectivity is expected to reserve skilled labor for more meaningful activities and bolster throughput. — C. Bernard
About the Author
About the Publication
- Podcasting
- Podcast:
- The Fabricator Podcast
- Published:
- 03/26/2024
- Running Time:
- 67:51
This week on The Fabricator Podcast, Jason Becker, host of the Arc Junkies Podcast and owner of Underground...
- Trending Articles
- Industry Events
Coil Processing Workshop & Tours
- April 2 - 3, 2024
- Corpus Christi, TX
GOLF4MFG South
- April 15, 2024
- Charlotte, NC
16th Annual Safety Conference
- April 30 - May 1, 2024
- Elgin,
Pipe and Tube Conference
- May 21 - 22, 2024
- Omaha, NE
World-Class Roll Forming Workshop
- June 5 - 6, 2024
- Louisville, KY