Our Sites

Is submerged arc welding the right process for you?

SAW can substantially improve deposition rates, but it is best-suited to certain applications

submerged arc welding pipes

Figure 1
Pipe production is one application where submerged arc welding makes sense.

The submerged arc welding (SAW) process has the potential to substantially improve deposition rates and productivity and to provide repeatable weld quality. However, it is better-suited for some applications than others (see Figure 1). If you are thinking about using SAW, consider the numerous factors that affect process success. Material thickness, joint design, fit-up, and length all need to be assessed.

Also, be aware that achieving maximum success with SAW requires some homework and an investment in equipment upfront, but the investment can yield a significant and quick return in many cases.

How Submerged Arc Welding Work

SAW is a wire-fed process, like gas metal arc welding (GMAW, or MIG). Wire is fed through a torch that typically moves along the weld joint by mechanization. Understanding and controlling SAW is not significantly different than understanding and controlling GMAW. Setting the machine is similar, and many welding variables remain the same: Voltage still influences bead width, amperage still influences penetration, and increasing wire feed speed still raises amperage and deposition (assuming constant contact-to-work distance and use of a CV power supply).

Unlike GMAW, SAW relies on granular flux to protect the arc from the atmosphere. The arc is buried (submerged) in the flux and is not visible during normal operation. As the arc melts the wire, flux, and base material to form the weld pool, the molten flux performs important functions such as deoxidizing, alloying, shaping, and generating a protective atmosphere for the weld deposit.

What Can Be Gained From SAW Welding

An optimized SAW process can provide gains in throughput, time savings, weld quality, and consistency, as well as an improved environment for the operator.

Single-wire applications can achieve significant deposition rates (see Figure 2), depending on wire size, type, and polarity. It can be quite easy to use SAW to improve deposition rates over a current GMAW, flux-cored arc welding (FCAW), or shielded metal arc welding (SMAW, or stick) process. Welding equipment and filler metal manufacturers can assist you in determining starting parameters and provide insight on improvement potential.

In addition to productivity gains, the process can provide repeatable weld quality. SAW is almost exclusively a mechanized process. The arc and/or work-motion machinery maintains consistent travel speeds and torch positioning, so operators with less hands-on welding experience can easily oversee it. Companies can then allocate their most skilled personnel in the most demanding areas of the operation.

The process also offers an improved working environment because it has low fume generation and no visible arc. This minimizes UV exposure, so you do not need to wear a helmet or welding jacket, and it’s easier for other tasks to occur near the welding operation in progress.

Last, SAW produces excellent mechanical properties in the finished weld. Many medium- to high-basicity wire/flux combinations can obtain high toughness, even at or below -60 degrees Celsius, which can be difficult even for well-designed, rutile-based FCAW wires. Certain SAW wires and fluxes can also help maintain properties at high heat inputs, further optimizing potential deposition rates.

Submerged Arc Welding Equipment

SAW can offer substantial productivity gains in certain applications, but achieving those results requires investing in the proper equipment, in addition to the power supply and wire feeder. Therefore, the process typically has a higher capital investment than other processes.

single-wire submerged arc welding

Figure 2
Single-wire SAW can achieve deposition rates of up to 40 lbs. per hour, depending on wire size, type, and polarity.

To help optimize mechanization—and to provide varying levels of flexibility depending on application needs—numerous accessories are available.

In some applications, the torch is kept stationary and the workpiece is moved using positioning equipment. When arc motion is required, there are several options:

  • SAW tractors offer portability and flexibility for bringing welding to jobs located throughout the shop or a work site (see Figure 3).
  • Side beams or gantry setups are not portable but instead are a fixed installation, requiring work to be brought to the weld cell. This reduces time spent on setup and changeover, but also reduces flexibility.
  • An integrator can help design a custom system, such as girth welding for storage vessels and circular welders for attaching nozzles. Some systems can be integrated with positioning equipment to weld more complex geometries such as pipe saddles.

Compared to robotic welding, SAW mechanization is much more accessible. It’s typically simpler to implement and become familiar with. Although operator attention is required with this process, it’s often easier to adjust during welding compared to a robotic welding operation. In addition, SAW equipment is generally designed for ruggedness and reliability.

However, keep in mind that this process is limited to flat and horizontal position welding, which allows the use of high-current and high-deposition parameters. Using SAW for entire weldments with multiple welds may require large positioning equipment; several options include drop-tilt, headstock, and tailstock setups. Sometimes this positioning equipment can be cost-prohibitive, but in other cases the return on investment can quickly justify it and the process compared to welding out of position with another process.

Also, because you cannot see the arc’s position during welding, joint tracking equipment may be needed. Options range from simple, such as a laser that indicates the future position of the welding arc, to more complex, such as a tactile probe that can automatically adjust torch position.

Consult with an integrator or equipment manufacturer to determine the combination of equipment to maximize the potential and determine the ROI of a SAW operation.

Ideal Parts for SAW

Several factors make a part right for SAW. Material type and thickness are two important considerations.

SAW is best-suited for carbon and low-alloy steels, but it can be used for stainless steel and nickel-based alloys as well. And while SAW of thick materials is the most common, it is a misconception that the process can be used only on thick materials.

SAW is used successfully on thin materials in many applications, such as propane tanks and water heaters. Although high amperages are used, the travel speed increases significantly in these cases so that the resulting heat input is low. For example, single-torch SAW can be used to weld 6.5-mm material in a single pass at 800 amps with a travel speed of 76.2 cm per minute (or more, depending on joint design). Note that welding thinner materials also requires greater attention to the “smoothness” of the mechanization, joint tracking, and consistency of joint preparation. Joint backing using copper and/or welding flux is a popular choice for improved repeatability.

Regardless of material thickness, key part considerations for successful SAW implementation include the following:

submerged arc welding tractors

Figure 3
SAW tractors offer flexibility for applications where portability is necessary, such as working inside a vessel.

  • Joint and part geometries: SAW is suited to straight-line joints, since parts with jogs in the weld require more complex and expensive mechanization to handle repeatedly. And while SAW is well-suited for high-volume components, that doesn’t mean it is restricted to the exact same part over and over. Even job shops can take advantage of the technology. Parts don’t need to be identical, but they should have similar geometries to maximize the process. For example, it’s common for SAW and equipment to easily weld both 3.7-meter-diameter and 3-m-dia. pressure vessels since the geometries are similar. The idea is to find parts that can use the same arc and work-motion equipment and placement to minimize changeover and, therefore, downtime.
  • Long weld joints: A disadvantage of SAW is the required interpass cleaning. For this reason, it’s better-suited to long weld joints (often 1.2 m or longer), which can be cleaned during welding. With shorter welds, the total amount of time spent cleaning is greater because multitasking is more difficult, and the ratio of arc-on time to time spent repositioning and readjusting equipment becomes smaller. As a side note, it is also important to consider investing in flux recovery and reconditioning equipment (a vacuum and oven) to minimize consumable costs.
  • Circumferential welds larger than 200 mm dia.: SAW is a popular choice in pressure vessel and pipe applications, because the vessel or pipe can be rotated on positioners. But below 200 mm dia. flux containment becomes more difficult because the flux waterfalls off the pipe. Because the weld cooling rate in SAW is slower than in other processes, using it on smaller-diameter pipe can also result in an unacceptable bead profile.
  • Parts with good access: SAW equipment is bulky, which makes space and part access key considerations. A system may need to be custom-designed for use in smaller spaces, but wire feeding may become an issue. The large diameters simply aren’t as flexible as the small diameters used on a robotic GMAW arm.

Joint Design Considerations

Good part fit-up is necessary for successful SAW, otherwise there could be a problem with burn-through. These issues must be compensated for prior to the welding process, and they may require mechanical fixturing and special attention to part preparation.

“Seal beads” made using GMAW, FCAW, or SMAW can be used to help compensate for less-than-ideal fit-up. These quick extra weld passes add time to the operation, but are often less time-consuming than if the entire joint was welded with a process other than SAW.

Potential problems also can be solved by reconsidering the joint. The deep penetration of the SAW process may allow root faces to be increased—or joint preparation to be eliminated entirely.

It may still be necessary to perform multipass welding, depending on material thickness or mechanical properties desired for the application. This approach can be better than significantly increasing heat to complete a weld in a single pass. Even though high amperages lead to higher deposition rates, SAW is not infinitely tolerant of heat input (a common misconception).

Submerged Arc Welding's ROI

The SAW process can provide significant advantages for productivity and quality in the right application. However, it’s important to have a good understanding of what the process involves, and make sure your specific application is well-suited to SAW before making the investment.

Integrators and equipment manufacturers can offer help in design and implementation of an optimized SAW process, or advise when SAW may not be the right process. In certain applications, the impact on the bottom line can be significant.

Photos courtesy of Miller Electric Mfg. Co.

About the Author

Robert Fox

Welding Engineer

101 Trade Square East

Troy, OH 45373

937-332-4000