Survey examines the postprocessing practices of additive manufacturers

Survey respondents reveal which additive manufacturing-related postprocessing technologies they use most—and which they find most challenging to use

According to survey respondents, the most common postprocessing technique is the removal of supports. Images: PostProcess Technologies

The information in this report was drawn from the results of a survey PostProcess Technologies Inc. released Sept. 1, assorted press materials, and a Sept. 3 webinar about the survey hosted by the company’s vice president of strategic partnerships, Dean Von Bank. The report is available at the company’s website. — Ed.

PostProcess Technologies’ second annual survey of additive manufacturing companies reveals key trends about postprinting and the AM industry as a whole.

Among the findings of the report, titled “Annual Additive Post-Printing Survey: Trends Report 2020,” are:

• Forty-five percent of respondents have been involved with 3D printing for six or more years.

• Eighty-five percent of users perform two or more types of postprocessing.

• The top complaint about postprinting is that it takes too long to finish parts.

• Postprinting challenges vary according to the type of printing performed.

• Most users feel current postprocessing technologies will not allow them to meet their future manufacturing goals.

PostProcess Tech said 50% of survey respondents have more than five years’ experience in AM and 50% have less than five years. Eighty percent hold positions in manufacturing, engineering, or R&D, or identified themselves as owners, managers, or executives. The largest response, 36%, came from the engineering category.

The number of respondents wasn’t available, but the company said 53% are from North America, 30% from the EU and Russia, and most of the remaining 17% are from Asia and India.