How metalworking fluids, corrosion preventives interact
August 15, 2002
Coatings for tube and pipe can serve as a primer for subsequent painting or they can provide corrosion protection.
Producers of tubular products used in oil field production, construction, and manufactured goods are responsible for manufacturing, storing, and shipping these materials to the end user free of rust and corrosion. This can be accomplished using a variety of corrosion preventive coatings, depending on the tube's final use and storage conditions. With today's concerns about costs, worker safety, and environmental restrictions, choosing the right coating for a particular tube and pipe application can pose a challenge.
In 1999 Quaker Chemical Corp. conducted a market study to uncover the current and future needs of worldwide tube and pipe producers regarding corrosion preventive coating application and performance. As a result of this study, the company was able to segregate coating requirements into two distinct tubular product lines: seamless tube and pipe and electrical resistance-welded (ERW) tube and pipe.
Seamless Tube and Pipe. Because most seamless tube and pipe is large in diameter, outdoor storage is a common practice. The coatings used for seamless products are predominantly colorless, because stencil markings on the tube must be visible for the product's entire life. Coatings are considered permanent and must be able to withstand corrosion despite outdoor storage (see Figure 1).
Pipes typically are bundled and moved outside for storage, regardless of weather, often within an hour of being coated. Rapid curing is essential to ensure that the pipes resist corrosion and withstand handling by the equipment used to move them.
ERW Tube. This type of tube is used in applications such as furniture, fuel line, decorative, and general mechanical. The specific use influences the type of corrosion protection needed. In some cases, the coatings may need to be pigmented, which adds another level of complexity. Coatings for ERW tubing can be classed three ways:
The market study revealed that alkyd- and acrylic-based coating resins cover the majority of tubular goods. Depending on regional regulations, either water- or solventborne coating formulations are used, with an ever-growing trend toward using waterborne coatings as the industry works to comply with environmental regulations.
To understand the implications this trend has on coating performance, it's necessary to have a more comprehensive understanding of metalworking fluids used in tube and pipe production and how they interact with waterborne coating systems. Some basic questions and answers can serve to develop this understanding.
How Does a Coating Provide Corrosion Protection? A fully cured coating protects a tube or pipe by forming a barrier that water or water vapor cannot penetrate easily. This barrier of protection helps to seal the steel surface and provides an additional layer of protection between the steel and the elements. While the coating itself is not totally impermeable by the elements, proper product selection can maximize film performance.
During the application process or subsequent handling of the tube, the coating can develop surface defects as varied as entrapped air bubbles and scratches to roller marks and chips. These defects then can provide a pathway for water or water vapor to reach the surface and begin the corrosion process. The critical link between surface defects and corrosion protection is adhesion.
Adhesion, which refers to the coating's bond to the metal surface, determines how fast, and to what extent, oxidation will spread across the steel surface. The more tenacious the coating's adhesion, the more difficult it is for corrosion to spread. A coating with poor adhesion rapidly delaminates from the surface, allowing oxidation to spread quickly.
What Influences a Coating's Adhesion? Coatings applied to tubular products form a mechanical bond with the steel surface. The tube's texture and cleanness are the key elements that can affect adhesion. In general, the rougher the metal surface, the greater the adhesion.
However, imperfections on the metal surface, which may make it appear rougher and therefore more desirable for adhesion, can be detrimental. These imperfections may delaminate from the metal surface after coating and provide a passageway for corrosion to begin.
Surface cleanness also is critical to coating adhesion but often is overlooked in the coating process. Not only can surface contaminants affect the aesthetic appearance of the coating, but they can lead to poor film adhesion as well. Surface contaminants can create different surface tensions in the film, leading to film voids. These voids, commonly called fish eyes, cause rapid corrosion formation.
Lack of cleanness may not be detectable during coating application, but it becomes evident when a coating does not adhere during a production run.
The type of coating system used also plays a role. Traditional hydrocarbon solvents tend to dissolve many forms of surface contamination, encouraging better adhesion. Because waterborne coatings are not as forgiving, surface cleanness is even more critical with this type of coating.
A variety of metalworking fluids are used during tube production. They are:
These fluids, which are neat oil or water-soluble, can be used in several processes before final coating. Once applied, they generally are not removed. The resulting residues, which consist largely of mineral oil, are the primary sources of contaminants in the production process and can have a drastic effect on coating adhesion, particularly in waterborne systems.
To understand better the interactions, the market study team examined several types of metalworking fluids and corrosion preventive fluids (see Figure 2). Then the team developed a procedure for quantifying the effects of adhesion and corrosion protection on pipe coatings.
ERW and seamless pipes were cut into 30-centimeter lengths and thoroughly cleansed of surface contaminants and scale. The pipes then were dipped into the various metalworking fluids, suspended for an hour to allow excess fluid to run off, and allowed to dry at ambient temperature for 24 hours.
A candidate coating then was applied to each test piece via immersion. Unlike atomization spray techniques such as airless or air spray, immersion application highlights surface contaminant-induced defects. The coated pipes then were suspended for an hour to allow excess coating to run off and allowed to dry at ambient temperature for seven days.
At the end of that period, a tape adhesive method established by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM, www.astm.org) was used to test the adhesion performance of the various combinations of coolants and coatings.
The study showed that the coating adhesion was most affected by the amount of oil present in the metalworking fluid. All coating types tested had 100 percent adhesion when paired with a metalworking fluid low in oil content. The lowest percentage of coating adhesion (less than 10 percent) occurred when neat oil corrosion preventive fluids were paired with low-VOC, waterborne acrylic coatings.
As environmental regulations restricting solvent emissions into the atmosphere become stricter, tube and pipe producers will be moving toward waterborne coatings to ensure compliance. As this study demonstrates, metalworking fluids have a significant impact on the adhesion of waterborne coatings.
A better understanding of metalworking fluid and coating interactions should help the industry better adapt to changing technologies and environmental regulations.