- FMA
- The Fabricator
- FABTECH
- Canadian Metalworking
Categories
- Additive Manufacturing
- Aluminum Welding
- Arc Welding
- Assembly and Joining
- Automation and Robotics
- Bending and Forming
- Consumables
- Cutting and Weld Prep
- Electric Vehicles
- En Español
- Finishing
- Hydroforming
- Laser Cutting
- Laser Welding
- Machining
- Manufacturing Software
- Materials Handling
- Metals/Materials
- Oxyfuel Cutting
- Plasma Cutting
- Power Tools
- Punching and Other Holemaking
- Roll Forming
- Safety
- Sawing
- Shearing
- Shop Management
- Testing and Measuring
- Tube and Pipe Fabrication
- Tube and Pipe Production
- Waterjet Cutting
Industry Directory
Webcasts
Podcasts
FAB 40
Advertise
Subscribe
Account Login
Search
Ask the Stamping Expert: What's the best-in-class process for developing a progressive-stamping die?
- By Thomas Vacca
- March 8, 2016
- Article
- Bending and Forming
Q: What is the best-in-class process for developing a new progressive-stamping die?
A: Many tool builders think the process of progressive-die development is undefined and difficult to predict, and therefore takes way too long.
Development is costly. It ties up engineering, design, toolroom supervision, toolmakers, a press, and possibly setup resources, all at virtually the same time. This can add up to thousands of dollars a day, not including the missed opportunity costs.
The following four guidelines will help you achieve best-in-class when it comes to minimizing development time and cost.
1. Design for Stability
In the November/December 2013 edition of STAMPING Journal®, I discussed a stamper’s dimensional problems—die shoe too thin; guide pins too small; no support under the shoe, resulting in flexing; down stops not robust enough to prevent hit-related variation - - and attributed them to a weak design. Two features that had a critical location relative to each other were done many pitches away from each other.
You must look at the part print and design the tool so that the way the cuts and forms are laid out will make the size and location of features a given. For instance, with a compound die, all inside and outside part features are functions of the punch and die. If the tooling is made to print, no development is needed. All features are guaranteed to be 100 percent relative by design.
Features that are tied together should be stamped at the same pitch. If you cannot do this because of the part geometry, you need to get creative. In my shop, we have added an extra tab of material with a pierced hole to install a pilot in the surrounding scrap to maintain as much dimensional stability as possible, and trimmed it off later.
Build in robustness, with thick shoes and robust guide pins, especially in older presses. Be aware of the flexing that may occur if the press has a large bolster opening. A few dollars more for upfront design and build to address robustness can save a lot of money over time.
2. Inspect Tools
Check critical tool component features as you build. Let’s say in development you realize a formed feature is not to print. The material springback is slightly greater than the engineering overbend calculation used in design—a common issue. You need to compensate and change the form punch and die. There is nothing worse than trying to fix this problem, only to find out later that the original tooling in the die was not made to print. Be sure to measure all tooling heights off a set point (usually a down stop or the die shoe itself) after assembly. This is the only way to discover height stack-up accumulations that will cause timing problems in your tool.
Do not assume just because the tooling was made by wire EDM that it will match the geometry used. You need to be 100 percent sure that the tooling meets the design and timing when basing your decisions on actions required to develop nonconforming features to meet print.
3. Stabilize the Process
The goal is to get the tool up and running at speed before tweaking the dimensions. The single focus here is stabilization.
I prefer to use micron sensors under the stripper plates. They measure the gap between the stripper and the sensor. If you pull a stamping slug and it lands between the product strip and die, this gap will change, and the micron sensor will shut you down.
Use at least two micron sensors in a 1-foot by 3-foot progressive tool. As the tool is running, you can view the reading at every hit. If you see a few 10 thousandths of an inch variation from hit to hit, you have a consistent, stable process. If you are seeing readings varying by a few thousandths, you have a problem. You must correct any instability before moving to the final adjustment phase.
4. Review Data and Part to Print
When reviewing the inspection data on the stamped part, start by looking at the range of the data. Do this by measuring the same feature over several parts. If the range is less than 50 percent of the specification tolerance, you generally have a process that is consistent and should meet a capability of 1.33—the general industry standard.
After you’ve determined the range, take a look at the mean reading of the data. You can use it as a guide to how much you’ll need to shift it to center the mean to the part specification. If the data has a range greater than the specification tolerances, how can you ever shift the mean to meet print? It is like trying to hit a moving target. You must first reduce the variation to an acceptable level, and then shift as needed. I have seen too many jobs pass first-piece approval, only to be shut down in production because parts are out of spec.
When in doubt, go back to the basics.
About the Author
Thomas Vacca
Micro Co.
Has a shop floor stamping or tool and die question stumped you? If so, send your questions to kateb@thefabricator.com to be answered by Thomas Vacca, director of engineering at Micro Co.
Related Companies
subscribe now
The Fabricator is North America's leading magazine for the metal forming and fabricating industry. The magazine delivers the news, technical articles, and case histories that enable fabricators to do their jobs more efficiently. The Fabricator has served the industry since 1970.
start your free subscription- Stay connected from anywhere
Easily access valuable industry resources now with full access to the digital edition of The Fabricator.
Easily access valuable industry resources now with full access to the digital edition of The Welder.
Easily access valuable industry resources now with full access to the digital edition of The Tube and Pipe Journal.
Easily access valuable industry resources now with full access to the digital edition of The Fabricator en Español.
- Podcasting
- Podcast:
- The Fabricator Podcast
- Published:
- 04/30/2024
- Running Time:
- 53:00
Seth Feldman of Iowa-based Wertzbaugher Services joins The Fabricator Podcast to offer his take as a Gen Zer...
- Industry Events
Pipe and Tube Conference
- May 21 - 22, 2024
- Omaha, NE
World-Class Roll Forming Workshop
- June 5 - 6, 2024
- Louisville, KY
Advanced Laser Application Workshop
- June 25 - 27, 2024
- Novi, MI
Precision Press Brake Certificate Course
- July 31 - August 1, 2024
- Elgin,